To contrast our very own next theory, we earliest recoded, each of the things that into the position measure, this new percentage of solutions that reveal if the husbands have less, equal or more scores, namely, standing, that have hypogamy, which means that husbands has actually down condition than simply spouses, homogamy, definition equivalent condition, and you can hypergamy, meaning husbands that have large standing than spouses. On the prospective connection away from nation, analyses was in fact significant into the knowledge (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you may economic impact out of a possible split up (X 2 =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Data indicated that, to possess Spanish users, there was a great deal more education hypogamy, while having Dominican users there is certainly a lot more degree homogamy. Concerning the monetary points in the eventuality of divorce proceedings, since there is even more https://datingranking.net/es/sitios-de-citas-milf/ homogamy to own Language users, there can be way more hypergamy getting Dominicans (see Contour step 1).
With prior marriages or perhaps not wasn’t relevant to variations in position. Concerning possible association ranging from reputation and ages hitched, tall relationships were found in fitness (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), even though getting partners y prevails (40.4%, each), getting partners y is present (43.4%). This means, to your classification with more age hitched, husbands has actually all the way down fitness position. That have youngsters out-of previous marriages and achieving youngsters of most recent marriage didn’t significantly apply to position.
Inside share, the newest analyses in regards to the 2nd theory showed that as opposed to our criterion, the greatest feature associated so you’re able to updates is the country.
Univariate assessment shown significant differences in grounds 1 (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
In the end, hypogamy issues within the Spain obtained somewhat below hypogamy points from inside the Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).